Commercial building owners face a common question when planning major envelope works: should they focus on cladding or roofing first? Both play a central role in protecting assets, tenants, and operations, yet the urgency and type of risks they address can differ. Cladding influences the appearance and long-term durability of façades, while roofing directly shields interiors from weather and structural loads.
The decision is not always straightforward. Some owners prioritise the roof to address immediate concerns, while others see value in renewing façades for compliance or energy performance reasons. Each option carries different cost profiles, inspection requirements, and impacts on tenant use.
Deciding where to start takes more than just personal preference. Owners need a risk-based approach that weighs possible losses, downtime, and long-term costs. This article looks at how roofing and cladding handle common risks and offers a practical guide to help owners set clear priorities.
Roofing and cladding each have important but different jobs in a commercial building. Both protect against the elements, but they handle risks and affect daily operations in different ways.
Roofing:
Cladding:
Roofing and cladding work together to protect a building from moisture, temperature changes, and fire. Knowing how each one works helps owners choose where to invest first.
When roofing or cladding is damaged, each brings its own risks, and the problems show up at different speeds. Both need attention, but the effects don’t happen in the same order.
Roofing failures often cause sudden and disruptive issues:
Cladding failures progress more slowly but still carry serious long-term risks:
A roof can fail quickly during a storm and cause problems within hours. In contrast, cladding issues develop slowly over years, gradually weakening the building’s exterior.
That’s why most owners fix the roof first, then plan cladding repairs or upgrades as the next step.
When choosing between cladding and roofing, owners should look beyond appearance or short-term costs. Using risk measures helps compare options more fairly.
Key measures include:
Owners can score these metrics across different envelope elements. For example, if a roof shows a high moisture index, frequent leaks, and long downtime days, its risk score will outweigh cladding concerns.
Looking at costs over the building’s life is important for asset managers. Sometimes, spending more up front saves money in the long run.
Modelling shows that roofing renewal often decreases lifecycle costs by reducing unplanned repairs, insurance friction, and business interruption.
Once the roof is in good shape, cladding still plays a key role in how well the building performs.
Owners should plan cladding upgrades after making sure the roof is stable. This order tackles the biggest risks first and keeps the building’s exterior in good shape for the future.
Wind uplift is one of the most common causes of roof failure in New Zealand’s varied climate zones. Proper fixing design and monitoring are essential.
Key considerations:
If you ignore wind uplift risks, storms can cause damage that starts at the roof edges and then spreads across bigger areas.
Fire safety depends on both roof and cladding systems working in concert.
Both roof and cladding must be specified with tested fire performance ratings, with details carefully coordinated at junctions.
Routine inspection prevents minor defects from turning into major failures.
Effective protocols include:
Finding roof and cladding problems early lets owners plan repairs and avoid expensive emergencies.
A simple decision rule guides investment priorities:
Checklist for triage:
Procurement structure influences cost control and warranty protection. Recommendations:
Commercial owners should apply data-driven checks on-site before making final investment decisions.
These checks give owners solid proof to support proposals to boards, investors, or insurers.
Every commercial building benefits from a clear order of work. Fixing the roof first cuts risk and protects the building. Once the roof is stable, cladding upgrades can improve performance and appearance without risking water damage.
Owners who fix the roof first lower their yearly losses, keep their business running smoothly, and save money over time. Upgrading cladding later adds comfort and keeps the building valuable. Doing both steps in order makes buildings stronger in New Zealand’s tough climate.
When deciding where to spend on building upgrades, owners should focus on the roof first. Cladding is still important for long-term strength, but it works best after the roof is fixed.
Choosing between cladding and roofing is not a matter of preference but of measured risk reduction. Our work across Hamilton and the wider Waikato shows that roofing serves as the building’s first line of defence. It controls water ingress, manages structural loads, and secures roof-to-wall junctions, all of which have immediate consequences for asset performance.
By addressing roofing first, owners prevent sudden operational interruptions and avoid costly internal repairs. Once the roof is stabilised, cladding upgrades provide additional value. Improved thermal and acoustic control, increased façade durability, and refreshed appearance follow as the next stage of a staged envelope programme.
This order protects your investment, keeps insurers happy, and makes financial sense over time. The message is simple: fix the roof first, then upgrade the cladding. Owners who follow this approach make their buildings stronger for tenants and for their business. Cladding is important, but roofing comes first when resilience is the goal.